Boingboing is one of the best sites on the internets, but I'll still chide Cory Doctorow for describing the Cato Institute as "ultra-libertarian, right-wing."
Two contradictory terms, bro.
Posted by Walter at March 21, 2006 07:54 PMwhere is the oxymoron?
libertarian is ultra-rightwing
So since when did supporting gay marriage, legalization of drugs, and keeping religion out of schools become right wing?
Posted by: Will at March 21, 2006 08:52 PMWhat Will said, (with some qualifiers), but in philosophic terms right-wingers generally believe government is the proper agent to enforce society's moral standards, libertarians do not. Right-wingers also tend more toward nationalism.
Those are pretty substantial differences.
Posted by: Walter at March 21, 2006 09:53 PMHey, I consider myself to be pretty right-leaning and I'm a proponent of gay marriage, legalization of drugs, and keeping religion out of schools (in a general sense, although we'd have to discuss specifics to find out if we actually agree on what precisely that means). A simple list of policy positions is rarely a good guide as to whether a person is a (to use the typical terms) conservative, liberal, libertarian, or what have you.
Walter's point--that a person's philosophy as to the proper place and function of government is what defines them more appropriately--is far more agreeable. If we were to discuss my views on what our gov't should and shouldn't be responsible for and involved in, there would be little doubt that I'm a Republican. If we just made a list of policies with up and down marks, the view would be more muddled.
In a way, I think that the focus on policy positions is precisely why people on the left and right tend to view libertarians as either left or right wing. The left would tend to want to demonize libertarians' views on things like taxation and social programs; the right would be more skeptical of things like (yes) drug policy and national defense.
The focus on policies just camouflages the fact that those beliefs are an outgrowth (often debatable even within the parties) of a more complete political philosophy.
Posted by: zombyboy at March 22, 2006 10:46 PM