He certainly seems to have no use for it his discussion. I think I understand now why the folks at Cato ignored him: what's the use in arguing with someone who demands you play the game but refuses to play by the rules?
I appreciate you picking up the torch over on Plumber's site. It seems like he's giving you the runaround, as well. His arguing technique revolves around making statements that noone is answering his arguments and then when someone does, never addressing their rebuttals and then critiquing the arguer. You can't win - he's rigged the system.
It was still (mostly) fun.
Leave a comment
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by published on May 22, 2006 9:12 AM.
Thanks Walter, I enjoyed that (and responded in kind).
Hey Walter - trying to get some conversation about this guy up on my blog forum - feel free to chime in if you so desire.
I think he's been immunized against reason. All he has is a series of anecdotes about illegal immigrants doing nasty things.
He certainly seems to have no use for it his discussion. I think I understand now why the folks at Cato ignored him: what's the use in arguing with someone who demands you play the game but refuses to play by the rules?
Walter,
I appreciate you picking up the torch over on Plumber's site. It seems like he's giving you the runaround, as well. His arguing technique revolves around making statements that noone is answering his arguments and then when someone does, never addressing their rebuttals and then critiquing the arguer. You can't win - he's rigged the system.
It was still (mostly) fun.